Skip to content

docs(sideEffects): documented rule and updated tree-shaking terms #2110

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 16, 2018
Merged

docs(sideEffects): documented rule and updated tree-shaking terms #2110

merged 5 commits into from
Jun 16, 2018

Conversation

pnevares
Copy link
Contributor

@pnevares pnevares commented May 6, 2018

Hello! 👋

  • Removed a duplicated tip in tree-shaking.md
  • Normalized references to the sideEffects property in package.json
  • Documented sideEffects rule in module.md (though I'm not familiar with its use)

Would appreciate any feedback! Thank you!

@pnevares
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like the latest Travis build failed because it triggered the Github API rate limit, not sure if I can start it off again.

@byzyk
Copy link
Member

byzyk commented Jun 14, 2018

@montogeek ^ is that CI build fail issue resolved in rebuild or at least on the roadmap? If not I could have a look at it since it happens too often

@montogeek
Copy link
Member

@byzyk I already tried to solve it: #1963

@byzyk
Copy link
Member

byzyk commented Jun 14, 2018

@montogeek seems it didn't work, right?

@montogeek
Copy link
Member

@byzyk No, it doesn't, It seems I am not reading TravisCI env variable correctly. Will debug

@pnevares
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looking like the latest build was able to complete successfully 🤞

@montogeek montogeek merged commit 5b364ae into webpack:master Jun 16, 2018
@montogeek
Copy link
Member

Thank you

@pnevares pnevares deleted the docs-sideEffects branch June 16, 2018 21:10
@pnevares
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the merge!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants