Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added note about b -> strong and i -> em #9

Conversation

david-waltermire
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@wendellpiez wendellpiez merged commit 3095afb into wendellpiez:issue473-rename-subcontrol Aug 27, 2019
wendellpiez added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
* Schematron now reports duplicate definitions in a Metaschema as an error: see usnistgov#465, usnistgov#475

* Catalog metaschema and SP800-53 catalog adjustments renaming 'subcontrol' to 'control' per Issue usnistgov#473

* Refactored metaschemas to avoid definition clashes; more/better Schematron to detect such clashes

* Adding new module now required by catalog and profile metaschemas

* Revising profiles to be valid to newly revised schema (no more references to subcontrol elements only controls)

* Bug fix in Metaschema Schematron

* Delete FedRAMP_HIGH-baseline_profile.xml

* Delete FedRAMP_LOW-baseline_profile.xml

* Delete FedRAMP_MODERATE-baseline_profile.xml

* Create temp.txt

* Revised FedRAMP Profiles

These files include revisions to the FedRAMP baselines, plus a small FedRAMP catalog that provides three subcontrols added by FedRAMP.

* Delete temp.txt

* moved updated fedramp content to correct location

* New and improved FedRAMP profiles

* Repaired broken markdown conversion; added missing title content to FedRAMP catalog

* add note about b -> strong and i -> em (#9)

* Changed inline markup in FedRAMP profiles for lossless conversion

* One more adjustment in Markdown->XML conversion (images)

* One more time (cleaning up cleanup)
@david-waltermire david-waltermire deleted the wendellpiez-issue473-rename-subcontrol branch October 16, 2019 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants