-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add "precustomized" custom element state #894
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9318a88
Add "precustomized" state
mfreed7 f63d8cf
Address review comments
mfreed7 cf4f0db
Custom element definition should include "precustomized"
mfreed7 ee36e05
Remove precustomized from "custom" definition
mfreed7 7431705
formatting
annevk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems wrong. Why would a custom element be considered as defined before
super()
call is made in the constructor? This will be incompatible with the shipping behavior of custom elements.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I agree. I've removed "precustomized" from the definition of "defined".
@annevk do you still think there is a need for more testing of
:defined
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should have a test yes, to ensure that it does not match that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I'll add a test that
:defined
doesn't match, pre-super()
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we already have a test for :defined during an upgrade, and I think it's good enough to catch problems here. Note a couple things:
:defined
already doesn't match during an upgrade, even aftersuper()
, because the custom element state is only set to "custom" after the constructor completes.:defined
prior tosuper()
shouldn't be typical anyway, since you can't accessthis
prior tosuper()
. You could use an external reference to the element to test, of course, but that doesn't seem like it'd be common.I'm sure I'm missing something here - please let me know what it is, and what you'd like me to test for. I can add a test for the second bullet above, but it doesn't seem terribly useful. It would catch the case where
:defined
matches prior tosuper()
but stops matching it aftersuper()
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added this additional testing, in case that's what you're looking for here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I think those asserts are helpful.