Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: make prepend more clearly operate on a list #328

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

annevk
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk commented Mar 11, 2024

Fixes #325 and closes #326.


Preview | Diff

@hsivonen
Copy link
Member

r+, but it would be worth considering if it should be called "restore" or "unread" to make the point that "prepend" is only ever used to put bytes back as if they hadn't been read and is never about any kind of other operation.

@hsivonen hsivonen self-requested a review March 11, 2024 14:46
@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Mar 13, 2024

Good call. I've pushed a fix for that as well as for the feedback in #326 about the example.

@stasoid
Copy link

stasoid commented Mar 13, 2024

Cool, that's perfect.

@annevk annevk merged commit 239008d into main Mar 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@annevk annevk deleted the annevk/prepend-list branch March 13, 2024 10:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ambiguous wording in GB18030 decoder
3 participants