Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use interface mixins instead of [NoInterfaceObject] #645

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2017

Conversation

romandev
Copy link
Contributor

@romandev romandev commented Dec 15, 2017

WebIDL recently introduced dedicated syntax for mixins[1]. So, we can
replace [NoInterfaceObject] and implements with interface mixin and
includes.

This following interface is impacted by this change:

  • Body

This fixes #624 issue.

Test: web-platform-tests/wpt#8701

[1] whatwg/webidl@45e8173


Preview | Diff

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Dec 18, 2017

Would you like to add your name to the Acknowledgments section?

Also, if you could add a newline before dictionary RequestInit I think that'd be good.

WebIDL recently introduced dedicated syntax for mixins[1]. So, we can
replace `[NoInterfaceObject]` and `implements` with `interface mixin` and
`includes`.

This following interface is impacted by this change:
  - Body

This fixes whatwg#624 issue.

[1] whatwg/webidl@45e8173
@romandev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@annevk Gentle ping :)

@annevk annevk merged commit 7e617be into whatwg:master Dec 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax
2 participants