-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Two issues with the steps determine "starting value" of <ol reversed> #1911
Comments
This was referenced Oct 17, 2016
You're right that this is a separate issue from #1617. Although, it is closely related, and so we should probably solve them both at the same time. I wonder if the "not being rendered" consideration applies to #1617 too. Per http://jsbin.com/jekokitonu/edit?html,css,js,output, it looks like it does, eek. |
alice
pushed a commit
to alice/html
that referenced
this issue
Jan 8, 2019
Closes whatwg#1750, by settling on the Firefox/Edge behavior. There is a separate issue of defining the "starting value" concept correctly; that is whatwg#1911.
alice
pushed a commit
to alice/html
that referenced
this issue
Jan 8, 2019
Closes whatwg#1911 and closes whatwg#1617.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
<li>
children, but also descendent<li>
s which are not wrapped in other<ol>
or<ul>
.<li>
s which are not rendered.I think the above behavior matches what browsers do currently.
(I thought it had been raised in either #1750 or #1617, but it seems to me none of them mentions the steps for "starting value" of
<ol>
.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: