Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct <img>.decode()'s in parallel usage #10753

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

annevk
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk commented Nov 8, 2024

One does not simply reject/resolve a promise.

This helps with #10608.


/embedded-content.html ( diff )

One does not simply reject/resolve a promise.

This helps with #10608.
@annevk annevk requested review from noamr and domenic November 8, 2024 12:43
@annevk annevk merged commit ce3c430 into main Nov 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@annevk annevk deleted the annevk/img-decode-in-parallel branch November 8, 2024 13:34
AtkinsSJ added a commit to AtkinsSJ/ladybird that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
This corresponds to whatwg/html#10753

While I was here, I've also implemented the check for the current
request changing, and reformatted the spec comments to match our style.
AtkinsSJ added a commit to AtkinsSJ/ladybird that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
This corresponds to whatwg/html#10753

WHile I was at it, I've also moved the checks inside the spin callback,
and reformatted the spec comments to match our style.
AtkinsSJ added a commit to AtkinsSJ/ladybird that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
This corresponds to whatwg/html#10753

WHile I was at it, I've also moved the checks inside the spin callback,
and reformatted the spec comments to match our style.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants