Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider defining "URL path" as a concept #792

Closed
annevk opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #812
Closed

Consider defining "URL path" as a concept #792

annevk opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #812
Labels
editorial Changes that do not affect how the standard is understood.

Comments

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Sep 25, 2023

@johannhof and I have been looking at cookie layering, i.e., a refactoring of the Cookie RFC. One of the things that would be useful is to be able to refer to a URL path as its own concept, similar to how you can refer to a URL path segment today.

(I think we only need list-based URL paths, but it seems okay for the concept to encompass both. Perhaps other cookie clients want to support non-HTTP(S) schemes in some manner.)
@annevk annevk added the editorial Changes that do not affect how the standard is understood. label Sep 25, 2023
@annevk annevk changed the title Considering defining "URL path" as a concept Consider defining "URL path" as a concept Sep 25, 2023
annevk added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2024
@annevk
Editorial: add a URL path concept
df4477e 
This will be useful for a future version of the Cookies RFC.

Closes #792.
@annevk annevk mentioned this issue Jan 22, 2024
Merged
annevk added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2024
@annevk
Editorial: add a URL path concept
d0237eb 
This will be useful for a future version of the Cookies RFC.

Closes #792.
annevk added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 26, 2024
@annevk
Editorial: add a URL path concept
94b8447 
This will be useful for a future version of the Cookies RFC.

Closes #792.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
editorial Changes that do not affect how the standard is understood.
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Editorial: add a URL path concept whatwg/url
1 participant
@annevk