-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor CSS to support review drafts #200
Conversation
Now that almost everything is on Bikeshed, this distinction doesn't save anything.
It is no longer used; we instead use either Bikeshed's built-in definition feature, or a specific one for HTML found in https://github.com/whatwg/html/blob/master/html-dfn.js.
Assumes the filenames in whatwg/whatwg.org#200
Assumes the filenames in whatwg/whatwg.org#200
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Putting review-draft.css
and standard-common.css
in fonts/
seems like a mistake, especially since you reference the latter as if it's in the root.
I guess the idea is that standard-common.css
is always included, even for Review Drafts?
Oops, good catch, will fix and force push. And yeah, that's the idea. Any thoughts on a better name? Maybe "standard-or-review-draft.css"? :-/ |
Perhaps |
This will require corresponding changes to the WHATWG boilerplate used in Bikeshed.
Fixed |
Assumes the filenames in whatwg/whatwg.org#200
Part of whatwg/sg#70.
The dfn.js change is a tagalong; I could split that out if people want.
To deploy this, we'd need to land this and speced/bikeshed#1239 at around the same time, then trigger Travis rebuilds of every spec.