Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

set cd speed to something different from max #204

Open
sp31415t1 opened this issue Nov 3, 2017 · 10 comments
Open

set cd speed to something different from max #204

sp31415t1 opened this issue Nov 3, 2017 · 10 comments
Labels
Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Feature New feature Priority: low Low priority Sprintable Small enough to sprint on Status: blocked Issue is blocked on another issue
Milestone

Comments

@sp31415t1
Copy link

I will appreciate to have the option to choose the cd speed to a lower value than my max cd speed.
rip will take more time but that's not really an issue.

@RecursiveForest
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is a good idea.

@MerlijnWajer
Copy link
Collaborator

Just wondering, what is the use case here? Percieved accuracy?

@sp31415t1
Copy link
Author

maybe better rip on damaged media.
for sure, less noise while ripping (I can wait a bit longer, if it is more comfortable for me)

@MerlijnWajer
Copy link
Collaborator

I do not think the speed makes a difference in accuracy - does anyone know if it does? The 'less noise' argument makes sense, but the accuracy I am not so sure of.

@sp31415t1
Copy link
Author

I have some media that are a "damaged", but I didn't try the speed impact on quality rip.
At 8x or 4x, It is quite silent. At 32x, it is a pain.
My computer is semi-fanless (fans are activated only when too hot, hdd vibration are neutralized).
The only device producing noise is optical drive at full speed. Nowadays it is almost an optional device.

@MerlijnWajer
Copy link
Collaborator

@JoeLametta - there's a PR for this out. What do you think?

@calumchisholm
Copy link
Contributor

I can't comment on whether it makes a difference to the accuracy of a rip.

My use-case would be to reduce the noise and heat generated, and maybe also to increase the life of the drives. I'm trying to mechanically automate my rips, so reliability is more important to me than raw speed.

@JoeLametta
Copy link
Collaborator

Just wondering, what is the use case here? Percieved accuracy?

Don't know if the drive speed actually has an impact on the ripping accuracy but it may be true: DAE Quality.

@JoeLametta - there's a PR for this out. What do you think?

Sorry: can't review it right right now. Will certainly have enough time next weekend, hopefully before...

@MerlijnWajer
Copy link
Collaborator

I will try to look later this week, if I forget, please just poke us/me.

@JoeLametta JoeLametta added Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Priority: low Low priority Feature New feature Status: blocked Issue is blocked on another issue Sprintable Small enough to sprint on and removed enhancement labels Nov 12, 2018
@JoeLametta
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue blocked on #244.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Feature New feature Priority: low Low priority Sprintable Small enough to sprint on Status: blocked Issue is blocked on another issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants