Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relicense under MIT #43

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2021
Merged

Relicense under MIT #43

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2021

Conversation

willeccles
Copy link
Owner

@willeccles willeccles commented Oct 19, 2021

I have decided that I would like to relicense this project under the MIT license (previously the Mozilla Public License 2.0). This thread will be used for discussion related to this change, and I will not move forward with this change until major/recent contributors have approved it. These contributors are:

Please review the changes and "approve" them if you agree to relicense your contributed code under the MIT license.

Signed-off-by: Will Eccles <will@eccles.dev>
@eepykate
Copy link
Contributor

Personally I'd use shorthand in the script itself, as in something like "Licensed under MIT (c) Will Eccles" / "By Will Eccles, MIT License"

Copy link
Contributor

@foxsouns foxsouns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nothing here flags with me here, personally. If it comes down to a vote or something, I don't mind having the license in the file.

@willeccles
Copy link
Owner Author

Alright, that's settled then. I won't change the license that's in the source just yet, I need to think about it. This is the way I would do it in C/C++, so I see no reason not to do the same in shell.

@willeccles willeccles merged commit 2701bef into master Oct 19, 2021
@willeccles willeccles deleted the mit branch October 19, 2021 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants