Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: Adapt to nom-locate style #64

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

fix: Adapt to nom-locate style #64

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

epage
Copy link
Collaborator

@epage epage commented Dec 30, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This builds on #63 to re-implement nom-locate

This took the json benchmark from 1.4362 µs (pori) to 1.9520 µs

@epage epage mentioned this pull request Dec 30, 2022
Merged
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3808443474

  • 0 of 32 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 56.405%
Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/input.rs 0 32 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3789372408: 0.2%
Covered Lines: 1823
Relevant Lines: 3232
💛 - Coveralls

@epage epage mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2023
Closed
@epage epage closed this Jan 26, 2023
@epage epage deleted the nom-locate branch January 26, 2023 03:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@epage @coveralls