-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[fix] preview collapsed repeater titleFrom #1191
Open
AIC-BV
wants to merge
2
commits into
wintercms:develop
Choose a base branch
from
AIC-BV:patch-25
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if the
text-field
class is on$target
, could we do&.text-field
instead? Also is this currently broken in both update and preview contexts? If so, what is the difference between them that is causing the structure of the fields to be different?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In update context the HTML structure is different.
It has an input field, which is selected in JavaScript.
titleFrom in this context is already working as described in the docs.
In preview mode however, the HTML structure is different.
It does not have an input field, but a
<span class='form-control'>
instead.The JavaScript will go in the else part and select the 'disabled text input'.
Here are actually 2 options:
<span class='form-control'>
This is where it goes wrong in preview context.
In case 1, it will try to select
.text-field:first
but that does not exist because its on the element itself resulting in an empty string.In case 2, it will find the first
ul
and display that text. In my case this is not my text field, but a balloon selector. Remember, there are no form fields in preview context. input & select are not present.So I fixed
Case 1 by removing the
.text-field:first
because it is an invalid selector. But yes, it could have the &. notation but don't see the advantage of that in this case?Case 2 will have the same behaviour as before: if there is an
<ul>
it will get that item first, if not it will get the.form-control:first
like in case 1.--
It is probably not entirely foolproof (working in every form situation) but it must be much better than it currently was because it has the same behaviour and a defined titleFrom now works in preview mode
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do I still need to do something to finish this PR? 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AIC-BV it seems mostly fine, would you be willing to take a stab at writing a test case for this?