Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SOFT-4951 #138

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

SOFT-4951 #138

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ninedev-i
Copy link
Contributor

@ninedev-i ninedev-i commented Feb 14, 2025

Изменил логику - теперь больше полей ожидается с бэкенда

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Expanded product details now offer richer descriptions, enabling clearer display of key product information.
    • Improved data retrieval on product pages delivers enhanced consistency in page titles and overall product presentation.
  • Documentation

    • Refined product catalog content for several products, featuring streamlined metadata and clearer, more consistent descriptions.
    • Enhanced image presentation with new width attributes for better layout consistency.

@ninedev-i ninedev-i requested review from a team as code owners February 14, 2025 14:56
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes extend the Product interface by adding four new descriptive properties. The product retrieval process in components is updated to destructure the API response directly. The API fetching mechanism is modified in the useApi composable to use a new async data method with enhanced type safety. Additionally, multiple content documents have been reformatted to update metadata and improve the structure of product documentation. Finally, the page that displays product details now leverages the new Product properties to build dynamic page titles.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
common/types.ts Added new properties (name, type, title, sub_title) to the Product interface.
components/content/Product.vue
pages/contents/product/[slug].vue
Updated product data handling: destructured API response using useApi, and adjusted the template and title construction to use the new Product properties.
composables/useApi.ts Modified API fetching: replaced useFetch with useAsyncData, updated types and parameters, and refined data parsing logic.
content/ru/_catalog/WBIO-DI-WD-14.md
content/ru/_catalog/wb-msw-v4.md
content/ru/_catalog/wiren-board-8.md
Reformatted metadata and product documentation: updated titles, removed or reformatted type/sub_title fields, and corrected keywords and content structure.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant P as Product Page ([slug].vue)
    participant A as useApi Composable
    participant F as $fetch API

    U->>P: Navigate to product page
    P->>A: Call useApi<Product>(url)
    A->>F: Execute $fetch with options (baseURL, headers, params)
    F-->>A: Return API response
    A-->>P: Return parsed product data
    P->>P: Update title and render product details
    P->>U: Display updated product page
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Feature/product page #83: Similar adjustments were made to the Product component and interface to enhance product detail rendering.

Suggested reviewers

  • aadegtyarev
  • KraPete
  • lostpoint-ru

Poem

Under moonlit code I hop, so merry and spry,
New fields in products make my heart fly high.
API calls and data leap like carrots in delight,
Each component dances, coding through the night.
With every change, my bunny heart sings on the run,
Cheers to fresh updates—the coding day’s begun! 🐰
Hop on, dear coder, let’s have some fun!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e1f6f4 and 5fc0635.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • content/ru/_catalog/wb-msw-v4.md (10 hunks)
  • content/ru/_catalog/wiren-board-8.md (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • content/ru/_catalog/wiren-board-8.md
  • content/ru/_catalog/wb-msw-v4.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: docker

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
composables/useApi.ts (1)

9-10: Validate secure storage of credentials.

Embedding credentials into useRuntimeConfig() and encoding them with btoa might introduce security or compliance concerns. If these credentials are static or sensitive, consider storing them in a secure secret vault or confirming that this usage is acceptable.

pages/contents/product/[slug].vue (1)

20-20: Dynamic title composition is correct.

Using optional chaining for type and a fallback for the product name ensures the page title won't break if data is missing. Consider a more explicit fallback in case product.value is null to guide SEO and user context.

common/types.ts (1)

42-45: Great addition of descriptive fields.

Adding name, type, title, and sub_title extends the interface meaningfully. One minor naming consideration: “type” might cause slight confusion in TypeScript contexts. If collisions arise or clarity is desired, consider “productType” or “category” (if it makes sense with your domain model).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5a5ac1 and 8e1f6f4.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • common/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • components/content/Product.vue (1 hunks)
  • composables/useApi.ts (1 hunks)
  • content/ru/_catalog/WBIO-DI-WD-14.md (0 hunks)
  • content/ru/_catalog/wb-msw-v4.md (0 hunks)
  • content/ru/_catalog/wiren-board-8.md (0 hunks)
  • pages/contents/product/[slug].vue (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • content/ru/_catalog/WBIO-DI-WD-14.md
  • content/ru/_catalog/wb-msw-v4.md
  • content/ru/_catalog/wiren-board-8.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: docker
🔇 Additional comments (7)
composables/useApi.ts (2)

1-2: Imports look correct.

The introduced types from #app/composables/asyncData (including _AsyncData, KeysOf, etc.) and the NuxtError import appear appropriate for the revised return type of useApi.


4-4: Confirm usage across the codebase.

The updated function signature returning _AsyncData<PickFrom<T, KeysOf<T>> | null, NuxtError<unknown> | null> changes the way data must be accessed (e.g., data.value). Verify that all existing calls to useApi have been updated accordingly.

pages/contents/product/[slug].vue (3)

2-3: Imports are aligned with new structure.

Bringing useApi and the Product type together here is consistent with the updated data fetching and type definitions.


5-5: Locale extraction looks good.

Using useI18n() to derive the locale is appropriate for routing and localized data fetching.


8-8: Handle potential null or failing API responses.

Although the code checks if data.value is valid, you might also want to confirm that the product.value—fetched via useApi—is not null or undefined to avoid silent failures on the product page.

components/content/Product.vue (2)

16-16: LGTM! Improved API response handling.

The change to destructure the data property directly provides better type safety and more explicit handling of the API response structure.


23-25:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify backend consistency for new product fields.

The template now uses new Product interface fields (title, name, sub_title). Please ensure that:

  1. These fields are consistently provided by the backend
  2. The fields maintain proper fallback values when data is missing

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent field presence in product API responses

# Test: Fetch a sample product and verify field presence
curl -s "$(rg -l 'useApi.*product' | xargs head -n 1 | cut -d'"' -f2)" | jq '.title, .name, .sub_title'

Length of output: 195


Attention: Further Manual Verification Required for Backend Consistency

The updated Vue template in components/content/Product.vue now directly uses the product object’s properties (title, name, sub_title). Please ensure that:

  • The product API response consistently provides these fields.
  • Appropriate fallback values are used when any of these fields are missing.

The automated script intended to verify these fields did not yield clear output. Manual verification of the API responses and the backend implementation is advised.

KraPete
KraPete previously approved these changes Feb 17, 2025
Copy link

@KraPete KraPete left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Посмотри, пожалуйста, на замечания роботов. Кажется, они резонные вещи пишут

@ninedev-i
Copy link
Contributor Author

Посмотри, пожалуйста, на замечания роботов. Кажется, они резонные вещи пишут

не в этот раз)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants