Skip to content

Update dt-relationships.md #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Sladerix wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update dt-relationships.md #1

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions content/docs/guides/dt-relationships.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ differentiate between the concept of a relationship and that of an instance of a
In the first case, we refer to a semantic concept where each relationship,
through its ```name``` and the semantic ```type``` of its target,
determines the different type of link that the DT can establish.
On the other hand, an ```instanc``` of a relationship represents the concrete
On the other hand, an ```instance``` of a relationship represents the concrete
link present between the DT that establishes it and the target DT.
For instance, in the case of a Smart Home,
the Bedroom DT may have two relationships in its model: one named ```is_room_of``` and another called ```has_device```.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -218,4 +218,4 @@ protected void onStateUpdate(DigitalTwinState newDigitalTwinState, DigitalTwinSt
System.out.println("No state changes detected.");
}
}
```
```