This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 26, 2019. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 490
added migration steps to v2.5.0 #149
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we link to a commit version of
tsconfig.test.json
instead of the master version? Could cause issues in the future if the file doesn't exist.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about that to, however I think that linking to the master version is more future proof. Say we release a version eg.
2.11.0
that requires some additional configurations in that file. When one tries to migrate from2.4.0
to2.11.0
they would have to insert the new configs as well, and not just the ones introduced in2.5.0
, which is an argument to why we always want to link to the most up-to-date version.If we one day remove the config all together, maybe we should change the migration guide to say something like "From
<2.5.0
to2.5.0 - 2.10.0
" to emphasise that the configuration is only necessary between those version, and was removed later on.Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah sounds good to me. Lets leave as is!