Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS #323

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

wneessen
Copy link
Owner

@wneessen wneessen commented Oct 4, 2024

Extended SMTP tests to include SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS authentication mechanisms. Adjusted the startSMTPServer function to accept a hashing function and modified the server logic to handle TLS channel binding.

Extended SMTP tests to include SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS authentication mechanisms. Adjusted the `startSMTPServer` function to accept a hashing function and modified the server logic to handle TLS channel binding.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (84f5625) to head (711ce2a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #323      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.85%   85.91%   +1.06%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        2350     2350              
==========================================
+ Hits         1994     2019      +25     
+ Misses        228      201      -27     
- Partials      128      130       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wneessen wneessen merged commit b988892 into main Oct 4, 2024
31 of 32 checks passed
@wneessen wneessen deleted the more-scram-auth-test branch October 4, 2024 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant