Skip to content

Conversation

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

@octo-sts octo-sts bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Signed-off-by: wolfi-bot <121097084+wolfi-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added request-version-update request for a newer version of a package automated pr labels Feb 11, 2025
@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Feb 11, 2025

⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL

Please use 👍 or 👎 on this comment to indicate if you agree or disagree with the recommendation.

To provide more detailed feedback please comment on the recommendation prefixed with /ai-verify:

e.g. /ai-verify partially helpful but I also added bash to the build environment

Gen AI suggestions to solve the build error:

• Detected Error: "Expected commit 80fa7c7c69b395c81385dd56fd2408c0f2564c68 for 2.1.4, found cc6cbb7e23115b4b90db472446cbdfcef2d9ba9c"

• Error Category: Version/Commit Hash Mismatch

• Failure Point: git-checkout step in the pipeline

• Root Cause Analysis: The expected commit hash in the melange YAML doesn't match the actual commit hash for the 2.1.4 tag in the upstream repository

• Suggested Fix: Update the expected-commit hash in the git-checkout step:

  - uses: git-checkout
    with:
      repository: https://github.com/RedisLabs/memtier_benchmark
      tag: ${{package.version}}
      expected-commit: cc6cbb7e23115b4b90db472446cbdfcef2d9ba9c

• Explanation: The build system verifies the integrity of the source code by checking the commit hash. The current hash in the YAML file is incorrect for tag 2.1.4. Updating to the correct hash will allow the checkout to proceed.

• Additional Notes:

  • This is a common issue when package versions are updated
  • The correct commit hash can be verified using:
    git ls-remote https://github.com/RedisLabs/memtier_benchmark refs/tags/2.1.4
  • Always verify commit hashes when updating package versions

• References:

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR label Feb 11, 2025
@debasishbsws debasishbsws self-assigned this Feb 11, 2025
The upstream probably re release with the same tag but with different commit SHA. the automation is trying to update to it.

Signed-off-by: Debasish Biswas <debasishbsws.dev@gmail.com>
@debasishbsws debasishbsws added the papercut Identified as a small, easily fixable issue label Feb 11, 2025
Signed-off-by: Debasish Biswas <debasishbsws.dev@gmail.com>
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. manual/review-needed labels Feb 11, 2025
@debasishbsws debasishbsws requested a review from a team February 12, 2025 15:31
@OddBloke OddBloke merged commit c4b93ae into main Feb 12, 2025
15 checks passed
@OddBloke OddBloke deleted the wolfictl-db729186-8f6b-40f3-881c-8a5d451d5526 branch February 12, 2025 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR automated pr bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. manual/review-needed papercut Identified as a small, easily fixable issue request-version-update request for a newer version of a package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants