Skip to content

Conversation

@mattmoor
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor commented Sep 6, 2025

No description provided.

@mattmoor mattmoor added the staging-build If this label is set on a PR, it will be built by elastic-build in staging label Sep 6, 2025
@mattmoor mattmoor marked this pull request as draft September 6, 2025 15:31
@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

octo-sts bot commented Sep 6, 2025

🔍 Build Failed: Checksum Verification Failed

Expected commit d2060242e9c7884194861b400435d9c93d35fa2c for v0.18.0, found d2060342e9c7884194861b400435d9c93d35fa2b

Build Details

Category Details
Build System melange
Failure Point git checkout step during source validation

Root Cause Analysis 🔍

The Git tag v0.18.0 points to a different commit than expected. The build configuration expects commit d2060242e9c7884194861b400435d9c93d35fa2c but the actual commit for this tag is d2060342e9c7884194861b400435d9c93d35fa2b. This is a source integrity verification failure where there's a mismatch between the expected and actual commit hash for the specified Git tag.


🔍 Build failure fix suggestions

Found similar build failures that have been fixed in the past and analyzed them to suggest a fix:

Similar PRs with fixes

Suggested Changes

File: ko-0.18.yaml

  • modification (git-checkout step)
    Original:
expected-commit: d2060242e9c7884194861b400435d9c93d35fa2c

Replacement:

expected-commit: d2060342e9c7884194861b400435d9c93d35fa2b

Content:

Update the expected-commit hash to match the actual commit that tag v0.18.0 points to
Click to expand fix analysis

Analysis

The similar build failures all involve Git commit hash mismatches where the expected-commit in the melange YAML file doesn't match the actual commit that a Git tag points to. In all three examples, the fix was identical: update the expected-commit field to match the actual commit hash that the tag points to. The pattern shows that when Git tags are moved or updated upstream, the build configuration needs to be updated to reflect the new commit hash. Additionally, some fixes included version bumps when the tag itself changed, but the core fix was always updating the expected-commit value.

Click to expand fix explanation

Explanation

This fix should work because the root cause is that the Git tag v0.18.0 now points to commit d2060342e9c7884194861b400435d9c93d35fa2b instead of the expected d2060242e9c7884194861b400435d9c93d35fa2c. The melange build system validates that the checked-out commit matches the expected hash for security and integrity purposes. By updating the expected-commit to match the actual commit hash that the tag points to, the validation will pass and the build will proceed. This is exactly the same pattern used in all three similar fixes, where the solution was always to update the expected-commit field to reflect the current state of the upstream repository.

Click to expand alternative approaches

Alternative Approaches

  • Verify upstream that the tag movement was intentional before updating the expected commit
  • Check if there are any security implications of the commit change by reviewing the diff between the old and new commits
  • Consider reaching out to the upstream maintainers to understand why the tag was moved

Was this comment helpful? Please use 👍 or 👎 reactions on this comment.

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR label Sep 6, 2025
@mattmoor mattmoor force-pushed the test-checkout-error branch from b9211f1 to bdbbda4 Compare September 8, 2025 19:15
@tcnghia tcnghia force-pushed the test-checkout-error branch from bdbbda4 to 732fd37 Compare September 23, 2025 23:14
Signed-off-by: Matt Moore <mattmoor@chainguard.dev>
@tcnghia tcnghia force-pushed the test-checkout-error branch from 732fd37 to 432b2bc Compare September 24, 2025 00:55
@mattmoor mattmoor closed this Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR staging-build If this label is set on a PR, it will be built by elastic-build in staging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant