Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Kubernetes) - Add UDP Port Support for Pipeline Services #2727

Closed
4 tasks done
J-Ha opened this issue Nov 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2993
Closed
4 tasks done

(Kubernetes) - Add UDP Port Support for Pipeline Services #2727

J-Ha opened this issue Nov 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2993
Labels
enhancement improve existing features

Comments

@J-Ha
Copy link
Contributor

J-Ha commented Nov 4, 2023

Clear and concise description of the problem

At the moment there is for at least the Kubernetes backend no option to specify the type of a service port.
kubernetes defaults this to TCP

Suggested solution

Add an option to specify the port kind, and keep tcp as default if nothing is defined

services:
  udpservice:
    image: image
    ports:
    - 1234/udp
  tcpservice:
    image: image
    ports:
    - 2345/tcp
 tcpservice2:
    image: image
    ports:
    - 3456

Alternative

No response

Additional context

No response

Validations

  • Checked that the feature isn't part of the next version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]
  • Read the Contributing Guidelines.
  • Read the docs.
  • Check that there isn't already an issue that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.
@J-Ha J-Ha added the feature add new functionality label Nov 4, 2023
@qwerty287 qwerty287 added enhancement improve existing features and removed feature add new functionality labels Nov 4, 2023
6543 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2024
fernandrone pushed a commit to quintoandar/woodpecker that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement improve existing features
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants