Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cross building for Scala JVM and Scala.js #49

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 6, 2017
Merged

Cross building for Scala JVM and Scala.js #49

merged 14 commits into from
Apr 6, 2017

Conversation

xerial
Copy link
Member

@xerial xerial commented Apr 6, 2017

  • Cross build for JVM and js
  • Fix Scala.js test cases

@xerial xerial changed the title [WIP] Cross building with Scala JVM and Scala.js Cross building with Scala JVM and Scala.js Apr 6, 2017
@xerial xerial changed the title Cross building with Scala JVM and Scala.js Cross building for Scala JVM and Scala.js Apr 6, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.09%) to 86.321% when pulling b8588f2 on scala-js into 6b7c552 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.09%) to 86.321% when pulling b8588f2 on scala-js into 6b7c552 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 84.416% when pulling 93438e1 on scala-js into 6b7c552 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 84.416% when pulling a2aa4cc on scala-js into 6b7c552 on master.

@xerial xerial merged commit 663f311 into master Apr 6, 2017
@xerial
Copy link
Member Author

xerial commented Apr 6, 2017

@Lewuathe FYI:
Splitting build process into test:fastOptJS and test was necessary to avoid errors like typelevel/cats#1242

@xerial xerial deleted the scala-js branch April 6, 2017 07:51
@xerial xerial mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants