Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update safer-golangci-lint.yml for 1.52.2 #8

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 15, 2023
Merged

Conversation

x448
Copy link
Owner

@x448 x448 commented May 14, 2023

Release v1.52.2 (May 14, 2023)

  • Bump Go to 1.20
  • Bump actions/setup-go to v4
  • Bump golangci-lint to 1.52.2
  • Hash of golangci-lint-1.52.2-linux-amd64.tar.gz
    SHA-256: c9cf72d12058a131746edd409ed94ccd578fbd178899d1ed41ceae3ce5f54501
    This SHA-256 digest matches golangci-lint-1.52.2-checksums.txt at
    https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/releases

# Release v1.52.2 (May 14, 2023)
#   - Bump Go to 1.20
#   - Bummp actions/setup-go to v4
#   - Bump golangci-lint to 1.52.2
#   - Hash of golangci-lint-1.52.2-linux-amd64.tar.gz
#     - SHA-256: c9cf72d12058a131746edd409ed94ccd578fbd178899d1ed41ceae3ce5f54501
#                This SHA-256 digest matches golangci-lint-1.52.2-checksums.txt at
#                https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/releases
@x448 x448 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 14, 2023
@x448 x448 requested a review from fxamacker May 14, 2023 17:57
@x448
Copy link
Owner Author

x448 commented May 14, 2023

@fxamacker No rush, need a review / rubber stamp (to avoid hit on scorecard).

Copy link
Collaborator

@fxamacker fxamacker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks for maintaining these workflows! 👍

@x448 x448 merged commit 891adbe into main May 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants