Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testing: no more inout parameters in bottom-up test #2565

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

superlopuh
Copy link
Member

@superlopuh superlopuh commented May 12, 2024

This bit will make it easier to raise to memref and scf, the last non-riscv bits.

I visually compared these to the new kernels' assembly in the epxeriments repo, and they look pretty much the same.

@superlopuh superlopuh added the testing PRs that modify tests label May 12, 2024
@superlopuh superlopuh self-assigned this May 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.74%. Comparing base (76f4d77) to head (8375bdd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                    Coverage Diff                    @@
##           sasha/snitch/no-dense    #2565      +/-   ##
=========================================================
- Coverage                  89.75%   89.74%   -0.01%     
=========================================================
  Files                        354      354              
  Lines                      44750    44750              
  Branches                    6714     6714              
=========================================================
- Hits                       40165    40163       -2     
- Misses                      3603     3605       +2     
  Partials                     982      982              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@superlopuh superlopuh force-pushed the sasha/snitch/no-inout-again branch from 32b2396 to 8375bdd Compare May 12, 2024 21:57
// CHECK-NEXT: mv t3, a0
// CHECK-NEXT: mv t1, a1
// CHECK-NEXT: li t4, -1060927488
// CHECK-NEXT: sw t4, -4(sp)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the only bit that I haven't tested, but it should be ok

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fine, we don't really respect the stack much anyway right now 😄

@AntonLydike
Copy link
Collaborator

I visually compared these to the new kernels' assembly in the epxeriments repo, and they look pretty much the same.

lol 😄

Copy link
Collaborator

@AntonLydike AntonLydike left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep! This looks good to me! 👍

// CHECK-NEXT: mv t3, a0
// CHECK-NEXT: mv t1, a1
// CHECK-NEXT: li t4, -1060927488
// CHECK-NEXT: sw t4, -4(sp)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fine, we don't really respect the stack much anyway right now 😄

Base automatically changed from sasha/snitch/no-dense to main May 13, 2024 18:31
@superlopuh superlopuh merged commit c566b0d into main May 13, 2024
9 checks passed
@superlopuh superlopuh deleted the sasha/snitch/no-inout-again branch May 13, 2024 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
testing PRs that modify tests
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants