-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
testing: no more inout parameters in bottom-up test #2565
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## sasha/snitch/no-dense #2565 +/- ##
=========================================================
- Coverage 89.75% 89.74% -0.01%
=========================================================
Files 354 354
Lines 44750 44750
Branches 6714 6714
=========================================================
- Hits 40165 40163 -2
- Misses 3603 3605 +2
Partials 982 982 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
32b2396
to
8375bdd
Compare
// CHECK-NEXT: mv t3, a0 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: mv t1, a1 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: li t4, -1060927488 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: sw t4, -4(sp) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is the only bit that I haven't tested, but it should be ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be fine, we don't really respect the stack much anyway right now 😄
lol 😄 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep! This looks good to me! 👍
// CHECK-NEXT: mv t3, a0 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: mv t1, a1 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: li t4, -1060927488 | ||
// CHECK-NEXT: sw t4, -4(sp) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be fine, we don't really respect the stack much anyway right now 😄
This bit will make it easier to raise to memref and scf, the last non-riscv bits.
I visually compared these to the new kernels' assembly in the epxeriments repo, and they look pretty much the same.