Add reproduction for overwriting files in a war with an AMP #238
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vierbergenlars
changed the title
vierbergenlars
changed the title
vierbergenlars
force-pushed
the
issue-229
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b989aec to
93edab7
Compare
vierbergenlars
force-pushed
the
issue-229
branch
from
93edab7 to
76a3651
Compare
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
thijslemmens
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overwriting files in an alfresco WAR with an AMP should work, also when using the
alfrescoWartask.It appears that this issue was already fixed as a side-effect of #220, where duplicates strategy was
changed from EXCLUDE to INCLUDE.
Fixes #229