tweak analysis

analysis.md

@@ -550,19 +550,14 @@ algorithm in many key aspects:
 - It uses a more sophisticated link between spatial frequency and minimum
  color contrast that might allow for more nuanced thresholds.
 
-The new contrast formula agrees with WCAG 2.x for 83.9% of randomly picked
-color pairs. That number rises to 92.5% for a modified WCAG 2.x formula with a
-flare value of 0.4. As far as I understand, this is not a realistic value for
-flare. So the physical interpretation might be incorrect. This would however
-explain why APCA reports lower contrast for darker colors.
-
 So far I like many of the ideas of APCA, but I am not convinced that they are a
 significant enough improvement to justify breaking backwards compatibility. I
-am also concerned by the [lack of publicly available evidence]. Then again, the
-new algorithm cannot really be evaluated without first making some policy
-decisions, e.g. which viewing conditions we are aiming for. I hope this
-analysis can support the community in figuring out what questions need to be
-answered.
+am also concerned by the [lack of publicly available evidence].
+
+Then again, the new algorithm cannot really be evaluated without first making
+some policy decisions, e.g. which viewing conditions we are aiming for. I hope
+this analysis can support the community in figuring out what questions need to
+be answered.
 
 [Web Content Accessibility Guidelines]: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
 [sRGB color space]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRGB