We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
因为skip-gram模型是根据中心词预测中心词的上下文,这直观上看来,应该“难度”会大于CBOW,那么按理来说会需要更多的语料才能比较好的收敛,那为什么小语料的情况下反而skip-gram表现更好一些呢? 参考资料:http://licstar.net/archives/620
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
补充:skip-gram 对低频词会更友好一些
Sorry, something went wrong.
Assignment xixiaoyao#3 , w/ans to written parts
d9b0232
No branches or pull requests
因为skip-gram模型是根据中心词预测中心词的上下文,这直观上看来,应该“难度”会大于CBOW,那么按理来说会需要更多的语料才能比较好的收敛,那为什么小语料的情况下反而skip-gram表现更好一些呢?
参考资料:http://licstar.net/archives/620
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: