Skip to content

Conversation

@star-hengxing
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @star-hengxing, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates the Pangolin library into the package management system by adding its definition. This enables developers to easily incorporate Pangolin, a library for OpenGL display and video input, into their projects, streamlining the setup and build process across various platforms.

Highlights

  • New Package Definition: Introduces the pangolin package, a lightweight library for OpenGL display and video input, complete with its homepage, description, license (MIT), and source URLs.
  • Platform-Specific System Links: Configures system library links (pthread, rt for Linux/BSD; shlwapi, gdi32, user32, shell32 for Windows/MinGW; Cocoa framework for macOS) based on the target platform.
  • Dependencies Management: Declares cmake and eigen as core dependencies, and conditionally adds glew (for non-WASM/Linux) or libepoxy (for Linux) to provide necessary OpenGL support.
  • Conditional Defines: Sets platform-specific preprocessor defines (_WIN_, _LINUX_, _OSX_, _EMSCRIPTEN_) and OpenGL-related defines (HAVE_GLES, HAVE_GLES_2, HAVE_GLEW, HAVE_EPOXY) during the package loading phase.
  • CMake-based Installation: Implements an on_install function that leverages CMake to build the package, allowing for flexible configuration of shared libraries, debug/release builds, optional tools, and handling of the GLEW_STATIC define for static glew linking.
  • Basic Functionality Test: Includes a C++ snippet test to verify the fundamental functionality of Pangolin, specifically demonstrating the creation of an OpenGL window, ensuring the package can be used correctly post-installation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new package for the pangolin library. The implementation is mostly correct, but I've identified a few areas for improvement. My feedback includes suggestions to align with repository conventions for versioning, simplify conditional logic for dependencies to improve readability, and use a more idiomatic approach for setting compiler definitions during the build process. These changes will enhance the maintainability and robustness of the package definition.

@star-hengxing star-hengxing marked this pull request as draft October 28, 2025 09:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants