Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add MetaAI Provider and some small improvments #1865

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hlohaus
Copy link
Collaborator

@hlohaus hlohaus commented Apr 20, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello H Lohaus,

Thank you for your contribution to the project. I've reviewed your pull request titled "Add MetaAI Provider and some small improvements." Here's the feedback:

General Observations:

  • The addition of the MetaAI provider is a significant update.
  • Renaming the example files to be under the etc/examples directory improves the project structure.
  • The introduction of the needs_auth attribute in the BingCreateImages provider is a good security measure.

Specific Feedback:

  • In api.py, the stream handling for the MetaAI provider looks robust. However, ensure that the endpoint is active and can handle the expected load.
  • The renaming of files is executed correctly with proper similarity indexes.
  • In Ecosia.py, the addition of a new model "green" is noted. Make sure to document what this model represents and how it differs from the default.
  • In MetaAI.py, the async generator pattern is well implemented. The use of uuid for generating unique conversation IDs is a good practice.
  • The needs_auth flag addition in BingCreateImages.py is crucial, but make sure to handle the authentication flow properly.
  • There's a typo correction from lebel to label in Groq.py, which is a good catch.
  • The restructuring of the API initialization in __init__.py seems to streamline the setup process.

Suggestions:

  • Ensure that all new dependencies are added to the project's requirements file.
  • Consider adding unit tests for the new provider to ensure its stability and performance.
  • It would be beneficial to add a description in the pull request to outline the changes and their impact on the project.

Overall, the pull request is well-structured and introduces valuable features to the project. Great work!

Please address the above feedback before we can merge your changes.

Best regards,
g4f Copilot

etc/examples/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
etc/examples/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
etc/examples/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
etc/examples/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
etc/examples/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
g4f/gui/client/static/js/chat.v1.js Show resolved Hide resolved
g4f/gui/server/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
g4f/gui/server/api.py Show resolved Hide resolved
g4f/providers/types.py Show resolved Hide resolved
g4f/providers/types.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@hlohaus hlohaus merged commit da81d1e into xtekky:main Apr 20, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant