Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved CONTRIBUTING.md #110

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 13, 2024
Merged

improved CONTRIBUTING.md #110

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 13, 2024

Conversation

Innovatorcloudy
Copy link
Contributor

@Innovatorcloudy Innovatorcloudy commented Oct 7, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced clarity and organization of the CONTRIBUTING.md file.
    • Introduced a new "Getting Started" section with a step-by-step guide for project setup.
    • Reformatted contribution methods into a clearer bulleted list.
    • Consolidated instructions for tests and code quality under the "Pull Requests" section.
    • Renamed and clarified the "Maintainers" section to emphasize their role.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The CONTRIBUTING.md file has been significantly revised to enhance clarity and engagement. Key updates include a rephrased introduction expressing appreciation for contributions, a bulleted list of contribution methods, a renamed section on maintainers, and the addition of a "Getting Started" section with installation instructions. Instructions for testing and code quality have been consolidated under the "Pull Requests" section, while the "Local Development" section has been streamlined. Minor adjustments were made to the "Coding Style" and "Testing" sections, and the "Releasing" section has been simplified for clarity.

Changes

File Change Summary
CONTRIBUTING.md - Rephrased introduction to express gratitude and encourage contributions.
- Reformatted contribution methods into a bulleted list with clear headings.
- Renamed "Installing dependencies" to "Maintainers" and clarified maintainer roles.
- Added "Getting Started" section with step-by-step installation guide.
- Consolidated test and code quality instructions under "Pull Requests."
- Streamlined "Local Development" section; minor adjustments to "Coding Style" and "Testing."
- Simplified "Releasing" section for clarity.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
CONTRIBUTING.md (2)

3-9: Excellent improvements to the introduction!

The rephrased introduction and the bulleted list of contribution methods greatly enhance the clarity and approachability of the document. This change will likely encourage more contributions by providing clear, actionable ways for people to get involved.

Consider adding "please" before "Let us know" in the first bullet point for a more polite tone:

- - **Create an Issue**: Spot a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue.
+ - **Create an Issue**: Spot a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Please let us know by creating an issue.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)


17-40: Excellent addition of the Getting Started section!

This new section provides clear, step-by-step instructions for setting up the project locally. It will significantly improve the onboarding experience for new contributors.

The code block for the npm run cli-run command is not properly formatted. Please apply the following change:

-```
+```bash
 npm run cli-run
This will ensure consistent formatting throughout the document.

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote>

38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</blockquote></details>

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: CHILL**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78b50e78c17be99b761cd57a4f692152eb23990c and b698d52a197257bf7a2b83925b066bb8f727f571.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary>

* CONTRIBUTING.md (2 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary>



<details>
<summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>CONTRIBUTING.md</summary><blockquote>

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)

---

[grammar] ~13-~13: Use a singular noun after the quantifier ‘every’, or change it to “all”.
Context: ...are welcome, please understand that not every suggestions may be accepted if they don't align wit...

(EACH_EVERY_NNS)

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>CONTRIBUTING.md</summary><blockquote>

38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

47-47: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (4)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>CONTRIBUTING.md (4)</summary><blockquote>

`41-49`: **Well-structured Pull Requests section!**

The consolidation of test and code quality instructions under this section provides clear guidelines for contributors. Emphasizing the importance of passing tests and adhering to linting standards before submission will help maintain code quality.

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote>

47-47: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</blockquote></details>

</details>

---

Line range hint `51-93`: **Clear and concise development guidelines!**

The Local Development, Coding Style, and Testing sections provide essential information for contributors. The streamlined instructions and clear commands for linting, formatting, and testing will help maintain code quality and consistency across contributions.

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary><blockquote>

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)

---

[grammar] ~13-~13: Use a singular noun after the quantifier ‘every’, or change it to “all”.
Context: ...are welcome, please understand that not every suggestions may be accepted if they don't align wit...

(EACH_EVERY_NNS)

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote>

38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

47-47: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</blockquote></details>

</details>

---

Line range hint `95-97`: **Important reminder about documentation!**

Including this section emphasizes the importance of keeping documentation up-to-date alongside code changes. This will help maintain the project's overall quality and usability.

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary><blockquote>

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)

---

[grammar] ~13-~13: Use a singular noun after the quantifier ‘every’, or change it to “all”.
Context: ...are welcome, please understand that not every suggestions may be accepted if they don't align wit...

(EACH_EVERY_NNS)

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote>

38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

47-47: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</blockquote></details>

</details>

---

Line range hint `99-110`: **Simplified and clear releasing process!**

The streamlined Releasing section provides clear information about how new versions are managed. This transparency will help contributors understand the release process and how to request new releases when needed.

<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary><blockquote>

[style] ~110-~110: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 4 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2177 characters long)
Context: ...  Thank you for contributing to Repopack! 

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

</blockquote></details>

</details>

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->

CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.57%. Comparing base (78b50e7) to head (287001b).
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #110   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.57%   76.57%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        1665     1665           
  Branches      269      269           
=======================================
  Hits         1275     1275           
  Misses        390      390           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
CONTRIBUTING.md (2)

1-9: Great improvements to the introduction and contribution methods!

The revised introduction is more welcoming and the bulleted list of contribution methods is clear and engaging. This structure makes it easier for potential contributors to understand how they can get involved.

Consider adding "please" before "Let us know" in the first bullet point for a slightly more polite tone:

-- **Create an Issue**: Spot a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue.
++ **Create an Issue**: Spot a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Please let us know by creating an issue.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)


17-35: Excellent addition of the Getting Started section!

This new section provides clear and concise instructions for setting up the project locally, which is extremely helpful for new contributors.

Please add language specifications to the code blocks for better syntax highlighting:

-```
+```bash
npm run cli-run

- +bash
npm run test

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

27-27: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


33-33: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b698d52 and 269ea0d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CONTRIBUTING.md

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)

🪛 Markdownlint
CONTRIBUTING.md

27-27: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


33-33: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
CONTRIBUTING.md (6)

11-16: Excellent update to the Maintainers section!

The renaming and content update of this section significantly improve the document's structure and transparency. It clearly identifies the project maintainer and sets appropriate expectations for contributors.

This change successfully addresses the issues raised in previous review comments, including the grammatical correction suggested.


Line range hint 37-43: Clear guidelines for Pull Requests

This section effectively outlines the requirements for submitting a pull request, including running tests, linting, and updating documentation. It provides valuable guidance for contributors.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)

🪛 Markdownlint

27-27: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


33-33: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


Line range hint 45-84: Comprehensive development guidelines

The Local Development, Coding Style, and Testing sections provide clear and detailed instructions for contributors. The inclusion of specific commands for various tasks is particularly helpful.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)

🪛 Markdownlint

27-27: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


33-33: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


Line range hint 86-88: Important reminder about documentation

This concise section effectively reminds contributors to update the README.md file when adding new features or making changes. It's a crucial point for maintaining good project documentation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)

🪛 Markdownlint

27-27: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


33-33: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


Line range hint 90-96: Improved clarity on the release process

The simplification of the Releasing section provides clear information about version management. It effectively communicates that new versions are managed by the maintainer while still encouraging contributors to discuss potential releases.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~96-~96: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 4 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1869 characters long)
Context: ... Thank you for contributing to Repopack!

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)


Line range hint 1-96: Excellent overhaul of the CONTRIBUTING.md file!

The revisions made to this file have significantly improved its clarity, structure, and usefulness for potential contributors. The addition of new sections, such as "Getting Started," and the reorganization of existing content make the contribution process much more approachable and well-defined.

The changes effectively address previous review comments and enhance the overall quality of the contribution guidelines. Great job on making Repopack more accessible to new contributors!

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~6-~6: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ... a bug? Have an idea for a new feature? Let us know by creating an issue. - **Submit a Pull...

(INSERT_PLEASE)

🪛 Markdownlint

27-27: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


33-33: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

@yamadashy
Copy link
Owner

yamadashy commented Oct 13, 2024

I've made some fixes.

Thanks for the contribution!
I'll merge.

@yamadashy yamadashy merged commit af9c4c5 into yamadashy:main Oct 13, 2024
36 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants