-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added documentation for includeEmptyDirectories option to README #182
Conversation
Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request primarily involves extensive updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No issues flagged.
Standard Input can make mistakes. Check important info.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
403-404
: Consider grouping related output options together.While the addition is correct, consider moving the
includeEmptyDirectories
option next to other structure-related options in the example configuration for better organization.Here's a suggested reordering:
{ "output": { "filePath": "repomix-output.xml", "style": "xml", "headerText": "Custom header information for the packed file.", + "includeEmptyDirectories": false, "removeComments": false, "removeEmptyLines": false, "showLineNumbers": false, "copyToClipboard": true, - "topFilesLength": 5, - "includeEmptyDirectories": false + "topFilesLength": 5 }, // ... rest of the configuration }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
384-384
: LGTM! Well-documented configuration option.
The includeEmptyDirectories
option is clearly documented in the configuration table with an appropriate description and default value.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #182 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.63% 91.63%
=======================================
Files 35 35
Lines 1949 1949
Branches 439 439
=======================================
Hits 1786 1786
Misses 163 163 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
@iNerdStack I'll merge it right away! |
Added documentation for
includeEmptyDirectories
option to READMEChecklist
npm run test
npm run lint