Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rails4 support, PostgreSQL array and hstore fields support #56

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

turgu1
Copy link

@turgu1 turgu1 commented Aug 27, 2013

This is an update to support Rails4 (using the modification proposed by edwardvalentini in his own fork) and the use of array fields and hstore fields as supplied by PostgreSQL.

The Rails4 modification may render yaml_db unusable with older versions of rails (this needs to be verified). The PostgreSQL support changes are compatible with other kind of database systems. That doesn't mean it supply support for array and hstore fields for other database systems...

Cheers!

Guy

@turgu1 turgu1 closed this Aug 27, 2013
@turgu1 turgu1 reopened this Aug 27, 2013
@amir20
Copy link

amir20 commented Sep 23, 2013

Can this be merged? I see that it works.

@turgu1
Copy link
Author

turgu1 commented Sep 23, 2013

Good Day Amir,

I'm using it since a month almost every day now. Sure it can be merged. I don't really now how to do it.

Guy

Email: turgu666@gmail.com

On Sep 23, 2013, at 13:42, Amir Raminfar notifications@github.com wrote:

Can this be merged? I see that it works.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@turgu1 turgu1 closed this Oct 2, 2013
@turgu1 turgu1 reopened this Oct 10, 2013
@turgu1
Copy link
Author

turgu1 commented Oct 10, 2013

Sorry for this close / reopen toggling. I'm not familiar with the way github is working...

@dnrce
Copy link
Member

dnrce commented Nov 4, 2014

What is the use case for supporting functionality that's specific to PostgreSQL? If you're locked to PG, doesn't that mean you can just use pg_dump and don't have any need for yaml_db?

@jrgifford
Copy link

Having a cross-host, low-barrier data system has been nice for us at work (I'm using this patch). Yes, we could (and did) do zipped sql blobs - but then we couldn't put it into version control. Being able to go back to different database snapshots using yamldb has been very useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants