Path *bug* using wrong node binary.

[GlassGhost]

What is the current behavior?
Install command fails; won't run without sudo access, using wrong path to get node binary.

owner@Z50-75:~/yarn-sandbox/simple-samples/hash$ ~/yarn-sandbox/node/node ~/yarn-sandbox/yarn-1.6.0.js --cache-folder ~/yarn-sandbox/yarncache install
yarn install v1.6.0
info No lockfile found.
[1/4] Resolving packages...
warning electron > electron-download > nugget > progress-stream > through2 > xtend > object-keys@0.4.0: 
[2/4] Fetching packages...
[3/4] Linking dependencies...
[4/4] Building fresh packages...
[1/1] ⠂ electron
[-/1] ⠂ waiting...
[-/1] ⠂ waiting...
[-/1] ⠂ waiting...
error /home/owner/yarn-sandbox/simple-samples/hash/node_modules/electron: Command failed.
Exit code: 127
Command: node install.js
Arguments: 
Directory: /home/owner/yarn-sandbox/simple-samples/hash/node_modules/electron




owner@Z50-75:~/yarn-sandbox/simple-samples/hash$ ~/yarn-sandbox/node/node ~/yarn-sandbox/yarn-1.6.0.js start
yarn run v1.6.0
$ electron app.js
/usr/bin/env: ‘node’: No such file or directory
error Command failed with exit code 127.
info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.
owner@Z50-75:~/yarn-sandbox/simple-samples/hash$ 

If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce.
My friend didn't have node installed on his system so I sent him the commands to compile it, on my system I believe it's using the wrong version of node to install it wouldn't work on his system(vanilla ubuntu 16.04) without first running the commented out link command.

#Sandbox for https://github.com/electron/electron
mkdir ~/yarn-sandbox
cd ~/yarn-sandbox
wget https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/releases/download/v1.6.0/yarn-1.6.0.js
git clone https://github.com/electron/simple-samples
git clone -b 'v8.11.1' --single-branch --depth 1 https://github.com/nodejs/node
cd ~/yarn-sandbox/node
./configure
make -j4

#this shouldn't be necessary
#sudo ln -s '/home/owner/yarn-sandbox/node/out/Release/node' /usr/bin/node

cd ~/yarn-sandbox/simple-samples/hash
~/yarn-sandbox/node/node ~/yarn-sandbox/yarn-1.6.0.js --cache-folder ~/yarn-sandbox/yarncache install
~/yarn-sandbox/node/node ~/yarn-sandbox/yarn-1.6.0.js start

What is the expected behavior?
Should not need sudo access to /usr/bin/node

Please mention your node.js, yarn and operating system version.

[GlassGhost]

I believe this should be a serious issue, ESPECIALLY for people managing multiple projects running different versions of node.

[rally25rs]

I'm pretty sure it's going to use whatever node is on your PATH. You probably want to add the --scripts-prepend-node-path flag, which prepends whatever node you used to execute yarn to the path. Unfortunately that flag was broken, fixed by #5776 but not yet released.

According to the npm run-script docs it looks like npm will automatically do what that flag does if node isn't found in the PATH, but yarn may not have that fallback implemented.

[GlassGhost]

Seems to me like ‘--scripts-prepend-node-path‘ should be enabled by default, why would a user manually use a specific version of node only for it to search through your path for whatever version it finds first????

[rally25rs]

Marking this issue as a feature-request to change the behavior of the PATH building to assume --scripts-prepend-node-path by default, to better match what npm does.

If --scripts-prepend-node-path=auto is passed (which has been the default in npm v3), this is only performed when that node executable is not found in the PATH.

so if the node executable that was used to run yarn is not found in the current path, we should treat it as if this flag is enabled and add the path.

[GlassGhost]

I thought it was a bug; @rally25rs I agree, this is a feature request. I hope this goes through promptly so we can close this request.

I'm considering making a gui for yarn with electron, that enables users to select versions of dependencies based upon github release tags, maybe even some fork awareness.

[BYK]

I think @arcanis did something like this lately or war talking about it.