Report.java:209-214: Add a test to check whether passing...

[0pdd]

The puzzle 227-fbf042c2 from #227 has to be resolved:

https://github.com/yegor256/jpeek/blob/b753f7fd4d8c8ce884f311320a401342ddfaa6ee/src/main/java/org/jpeek/Report.java#L209-L214

The puzzle was created by Ilyas Gasanov on 27-Apr-19.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

[0crat]

@paulodamaso/z please, pay attention to this issue

[0crat]

Job #327 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

The job #327 assigned to @baybatu/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

[0crat]

The user @baybatu/z resigned from #327, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: It is older than 10 days, see §8

[0crat]

Resigned on delay, see §8: -30 point(s) just awarded to @baybatu/z

[0crat]

The job #327 assigned to @thomas-melville/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

[0crat]

@thomas-melville/z this job was assigned to you 10days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

[0crat]

Resigned on delay, see §8: -30 point(s) just awarded to @thomas-melville/z

[0crat]

The user @thomas-melville/z resigned from #327, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: It is older than 10 days, see §8

[0crat]

The job #327 assigned to @ebercamargo/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[0crat]

The user @ebercamargo/z resigned from #327, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: It is older than 10 days, see §8

[monomonedula]

What does it mean "really works" in "passing params to XSLDocument really works"? Need clarification @paulodamaso

[monomonedula]

@0crat wait

[0crat]

@0crat wait (here)

@monomonedula The impediment for #327 was registered successfully by @monomonedula/z

[paulodamaso]

@monomonedula We need a test that passes parameters in xml to xembly as in C3.xml, line 53.

[monomonedula]

@paulodamaso so the test should only check if the parameters are making it to the generated xml document?