-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 202
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add reproducer for #577 #947
Conversation
Job #947 is now in scope, role is |
This pull request #947 is assigned to @fabriciofx/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #947 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 74.1% 74.1%
Complexity 971 971
========================================
Files 222 222
Lines 4785 4785
Branches 361 361
========================================
Hits 3546 3546
Misses 1089 1089
Partials 150 150 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Serranya Done. Please, check it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Serranya done. Check it.
src/test/java/org/takes/rq/multipart/ContentDispositionHeaderText.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/org/takes/rq/multipart/ContentLengthHeaderText.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
7cc6927
to
4a39ec1
Compare
@fabriciofx Please take another look. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Serranya done. Check it again. Thanks!
@fabriciofx Please review once more |
@Serranya I seems fine now. Thanks! |
@rultor merge |
@fabriciofx Thanks for your request. @paulodamaso Please confirm this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Serranya Just a comment, please take a look
@paulodamaso @fabriciofx I updated the PR once more |
@paulodamaso Can you check what is wrong with Shippable? I think there is something wrong with Ruby installation... |
@Serranya it's ok to me. Thanks! |
@rultor merge |
@fabriciofx It seems that I've activated shippable for takes by mistake, let's ignore it |
@paulodamaso ok! You can merge it now. |
@fabriciofx Thanks for your request. @paulodamaso Please confirm this. |
@rultor merge |
@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here |
@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 18min) |
@ypshenychka/z please review this job completed by @fabriciofx/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed |
The job #947 is now out of scope |
Payment to |
@ypshenychka I updated the messages. |
@Serranya thanks |
@0crat quality acceptable |
@ypshenychka The project doesn't have enough funds, can't make a payment |
Order was finished, quality is "acceptable": +15 point(s) just awarded to @fabriciofx/z |
Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z |
This adds a simplified testcase for the problem described in #577
A puzzle tracks the completion of the actual fix.