Revert to Ruby Sass and add sourcemaps

[silvenon]

Sourcemaps will be generated without Sass as well, for PostCSS.

Fixes #256.

[silvenon]

Oh, I forgot to add. I'm reverting to Ruby Sass because I don't know when libsass 3.2 will be released and I want something stable.

[sindresorhus]

👎

[silvenon]

Why? I really like it.

[silvenon]

Not sure why tests fail, they ran successfully locally.

[sindresorhus]

I don't see why we would want to revert back to ruby sass again. Source maps are useful, but not that important. I'd rather have speed.

[silvenon]

I'd rather have merged @media queries. While nested @media queries are valid CSS3, nobody seems to use or talk about them much and they don't appear to work in IE11 (and maybe in other browsers which otherwise support @media queries). http://codepen.io/silvenon/pen/JoOxWb

I reverted simply because I wouldn't use this myself in the current state and I want to make a stable release. I'm planning to add libsass back as soon as I'm happy with it.

[sindresorhus]

It's up to you. Feel free to merge if you think it's the best.

I just don't care about IE.

[silvenon]

I only care about IE10+ and I think that's as far as we should assume for our users.

Ok, I'll fix the tests and merge.

[addyosmani]

I'm +1 for speed over source maps on this one. I can only imagine the majority of devs would feel the same, but perhaps consider asking folks if they'd prefer one over the other before landing? The differences during watch are particularly large.

[mattycraig]

+1 for speed for sure.

[austinpray]

FYI: node-sass is currently broken on 0.12. Also for the past couple months it intermittently fails to build on linux.

The instability is a drag, but I would have a hard time going back to ruby sass. I'm hoping I can spend some time this week to help the node-sass guys get 2.0 out the door.

[silvenon]

Speed > support for any IE at all? About 17% of web traffic?

[austinpray]

Not supporting latest IE is some silly stuff.

[thasmo]

+1 libsass

[arthurvr]

I must say I'm against dropping libsass too.

[mu7amad]

+1 libsass

[dbashford]

Largely unfamiliar with Yeoman, so sorry if I'm out in left field, but isn't this something you can ask the user during scaffold? Probably a goodly amount of rework to make that happen, but if folks are evenly split, if its possible... a worthwhile effort?

[silvenon]

@dbashford I think libsass is too close to being stable for this extra work to be worth it, but I can do it if more people would like this feature.

[silvenon]

Ok, everyone seems to be against temporarily dropping libsass, so I'm closing this in favor of #274, because I mainly wanted source maps anyway.