Skip to content

Conversation

@FrankiFixx
Copy link
Contributor

@FrankiFixx FrankiFixx commented Jan 14, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix?
New feature?
Breaks BC?
Fixes #234

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d00e8ee) to head (7c949b0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              master      #236   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
+ Complexity       829       826    -3     
===========================================
  Files             89        89           
  Lines           2229      2223    -6     
===========================================
- Hits            2229      2223    -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Co-authored-by: Alexander Makarov <sam@rmcreative.ru>
@samdark samdark requested a review from vjik January 15, 2025 18:03
@vjik vjik changed the title Fix 234 issue Fix #234: Remove attribute sorting Jan 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@vjik vjik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

We'll merge it after other BC-break changes are added.

@vjik vjik added the status:ready for merge The pull request is OK to be merged. label Jan 16, 2025
@vjik vjik added this to the 4.0 milestone Mar 8, 2025
@vjik vjik added the severity:BC breaking Breaks backwards compatibility label Jan 5, 2026
@vjik vjik mentioned this pull request Jan 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

severity:BC breaking Breaks backwards compatibility status:ready for merge The pull request is OK to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants