Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2024. It is now read-only.

Nuke: proxy mode validator #2052

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2021
Merged

Nuke: proxy mode validator #2052

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2021

Conversation

jakubjezek001
Copy link
Member

@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 commented Sep 21, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Adding Proxy mode validator for Nuke host

Testing notes

  1. Open your testing scene.
  2. Toggle Proxy button on (CTRL+P).
  3. Then open publisher and validate.
  4. It should fail.
  5. Then use repair action to fix it.
  6. Proxy should switch off.

@jakubjezek001
Copy link
Member Author

Task linked: PYPE-1837 Request - Proxy Validator for Nuke

@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 self-assigned this Sep 21, 2021
@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 added the type: feature Larger, user affecting changes and completely new things label Sep 21, 2021
64qam
64qam approved these changes Sep 21, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@64qam 64qam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

all good

@mkolar mkolar added type: enhancement Enhancements to existing functionality and removed type: feature Larger, user affecting changes and completely new things labels Sep 21, 2021
@mkolar
Copy link
Member

mkolar commented Sep 21, 2021

Task linked: PYPE-1914 Request - Proxy Validator for Nuke

@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 merged commit eb18c12 into develop Sep 21, 2021
@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001 deleted the feature/PYPE-1837_Request---Proxy-Validator-for-Nuke branch September 21, 2021 12:09
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@64qam 64qam 64qam approved these changes

@jrsndl jrsndl Awaiting requested review from jrsndl

Assignees

@jakubjezek001 jakubjezek001

Labels
type: enhancement Enhancements to existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@jakubjezek001 @mkolar @64qam