This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Finding it a bit odd to include "Implementation" into the class name. It's an programming concept.. and as the first line of the class comment states:
"Host is pipeline implementation of DCC application". So it feels a bit redundant.
Any issue with simply calling it "Host" ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not againts but
Host
is too short (for my taste), maybeBaseHost
orHostBase
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I personally felt the same as @icyvapor - I'd prefer shorter if possible.
Same for
MayaHostImplementation
- I'm not sure why it couldn't be calledMayaHost
.From a class naming convention I'd understand
MayaHost
better thanMayaHostImplementation
. The latter almost sounds like there's still anotherMayaHost
class somewhere in the code base.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed to
HostBase
andMayaHost
, is it ok? Any other comments?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only problem with
host
as a word, that it's super hard to find it in the code base when you need to trace it's usages.HostBase
andMayaHost
is pretty good and specific enough not to have millions of false positives when searching through codebaseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would
AsbtractHost
make sense too? I'm also fine withHostBase
by the way.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only abstract part of the class is
name
property. In future is planned to have more pre-implemented functionality thus I'm more inHostBase
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry guys, soon after the comment I was put out of commission for the rest of the week by some health issue. Thanks for addressing the comment.