Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2024. It is now read-only.

Refactor: changed legacy way to update database for Hero version integrate #3941

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 11, 2022

Conversation

kalisp
Copy link
Member

@kalisp kalisp commented Oct 5, 2022

Brief description

Operations used instead.

Testing notes:

  1. I am actually not sure how to test all use cases (with representations, unarchiving them etc), so any steps to test this properly are welcomed
  2. Publish any family that produces Hero version (I have tested in on model).

@kalisp kalisp added the type: enhancement Enhancements to existing functionality label Oct 5, 2022
@kalisp kalisp self-assigned this Oct 5, 2022
@ynbot
Copy link
Contributor

ynbot commented Oct 5, 2022

@kalisp kalisp changed the title Client: changed legacy way to update database Refactor: changed legacy way to update database Oct 5, 2022
@BigRoy
Copy link
Collaborator

BigRoy commented Oct 5, 2022

Might be best to update the title of this PR to state that it's only about Hero Versions?

@kalisp kalisp changed the title Refactor: changed legacy way to update database Refactor: changed legacy way to update database for Hero version integrate Oct 5, 2022
openpype/client/operations.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
openpype/client/operations.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kalisp kalisp requested a review from iLLiCiTiT October 6, 2022 16:07
Copy link
Member

@iLLiCiTiT iLLiCiTiT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small suggestion but otherwise it works.

_id set already higher when item is created.

Co-authored-by: Jakub Trllo <43494761+iLLiCiTiT@users.noreply.github.com>
@kalisp kalisp merged commit 46e1c9b into develop Oct 11, 2022
@kalisp kalisp deleted the chore/OP-4181_Integrate-Hero-version-using-operations branch October 11, 2022 09:30
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type: enhancement Enhancements to existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants