Improve performance for creating crdt.TreeNode

[hackerwins]

What this PR does / why we need it?

Enhance tree conversion for better performance

The time complexity of creating converter.fromTreeNodes was O(N^2), potentially causing performance bottlenecks. It's optimized to O(n) with this commit.

While this may not be a significant issue currently, there is a risk that as the number of tree nodes in the protobuf increases, operations will scale quadratically, potentially causing performance bottlenecks.

Any background context you want to provide?

What are the relevant tickets?

Fixes yorkie-team/yorkie#930

Checklist

• Added relevant tests or not required
• Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced new methods for converting tree structures, enhancing the module's functionality.
  • Added a benchmarking feature for tree structure conversions.

• Performance Improvements

  • Optimized the identification of parent nodes in tree processing, significantly improving efficiency.

• Bug Fixes

  • Updated existing benchmarks for clarity and naming consistency, ensuring accurate performance evaluation.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent changes significantly enhance the fromTreeNodes function's performance in the converter module, shifting from a nested loop to a more efficient Map structure for parent node management. Additionally, benchmarking improvements provide clearer evaluations of tree editing and conversion functionalities, ensuring the module is both performant and functional. Overall, these updates position the codebase for better scalability and usability.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/api/converter.ts	Optimized fromTreeNodes function using Map for parent node tracking; updated exports for public API.
test/bench/tree.bench.ts	Renamed benchmarkTree to benchmarkTreeEdit; added benchmarkTreeConvert for tree conversion benchmarks.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Improve performance for creating crdt.TreeNode (###930)	✅

🐇 Hop, hop, hooray, the trees now grow!
With speed like the wind, watch them flow.
No more loops, just a map in sight,
Our nodes dance swiftly, oh what a delight!
So here’s to the changes, a cheerful cheer,
Performance is up, let’s all give a leer! 🌿✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[hackerwins]

Before:

After:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.81%. Comparing base (02111d3) to head (b57857c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #875      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.85%   80.81%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          60       60              
  Lines        4639     4639              
  Branches      943      942       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         3751     3749       -2     
- Misses        621      622       +1     
- Partials      267      268       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.