-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revive of PR #1686. #1
Conversation
I used to work on the specification update to support the ServiceWorker static routing API (https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api) w3c#1686 However, I accidentally closed it by force-sync to the ServiceWorker specification's repository HEAD. This CL is for reviving it.
@domenic @sisidovski Can I ask your review for this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only one significant issue, about what happens if the "urlPattern"
dictionary member is not present.
Considering the future update of the condition, we should mark the case handled as one of conditions. Also, we need to make it extensible.
It was flipped by mistake.
I have updated the specification to make the case handled. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with nits
@sisidovski Can I ask you to take another look? Does it look good? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM w/ above comments.
I used to work on the specification update to support the ServiceWorker static routing API
(https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api) w3c#1686
However, I accidentally closed it by force-sync to the ServiceWorker specification's repository HEAD.
This CL is for reviving it.
Preview | Diff