Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes an issue where single quote would be considered invalid literal #15

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2022
Merged

fixes an issue where single quote would be considered invalid literal #15

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2022

Conversation

baywet
Copy link
Contributor

@baywet baywet commented Apr 14, 2022

fixes #14

@yosida95
Copy link
Owner

The logic part is perfect. However, the RFC errata has not yet been accepted, and even after it got accepted it wouldn't appear in the main RFC text. Therefore, could you add a link to the errata or the clarification thread above the single quote entry?

Signed-off-by: Vincent Biret <vincentbiret@hotmail.com>
@baywet
Copy link
Contributor Author

baywet commented Apr 18, 2022

thanks for the quick review. Added. let me know if you need anything else!

@yosida95 yosida95 merged commit c583dbd into yosida95:master Apr 19, 2022
@baywet baywet deleted the bugfix/single-quote branch April 19, 2022 11:04
@baywet
Copy link
Contributor Author

baywet commented Apr 19, 2022

Thanks for merging! Let me know when the tag is ready!

@yosida95
Copy link
Owner

I just published v3.0.2. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using a template with single quote fails
2 participants