Add test code linux_cgroups_devices #3000
Conversation
Signed-off-by: sat0ken <15720506+sat0ken@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sat0ken <15720506+sat0ken@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Hey @sat0ken thanks for the PR! I missed replying to your message on the issue, but I would have requested you to wait a bit before opening the PR. There is another PR which makes some refactor on test code, and that has been waiting for sometime to get merged. I plan to get that merged first and then ask authors of open test PRs to rebase on the main for the changes. I'll ping you once that is done, so you can rebase, and then I'll review this one. I also request you to hold off on the relative_devices PR till that is done, but I have assigned that to you on the issue. |
|
@YJDoc2 OK! I got it. thank you. |
|
Hey @sat0ken , that PR is merged, so you can rebase this once and also work on the relative devices. However, in future I will request to only work on one PR at a time 😅 |
|
@YJDoc2 Thank you for notify.
I'm sorry, I'll be careful from now on. |
There is no need to apologize; @YJDoc2 has just suggested a smooth way to develop. I often make this mistake myself 🙃 |
| .access(allow.to_string()) | ||
| .typ(dev_type) | ||
| .major(major) | ||
| .minor(minor) | ||
| .access(access) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are we setting access twice? Is one of them supposed to be allow instead?
| linux_device_build(true, LinuxDeviceType::C, 10, 229, "rwm".to_string()), | ||
| linux_device_build(true, LinuxDeviceType::B, 8, 20, "rw".to_string()), | ||
| linux_device_build(true, LinuxDeviceType::B, 10, 200, "r".to_string()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we are setting true in all three, we can instead directly set true in the function, and not pass the parameter at all.
| test_result!(check_container_created(&data)); | ||
| TestResult::Passed |
| if let TestResult::Failed(_) = test_result { | ||
| return test_result; | ||
| } | ||
| test_result |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is no-op, we can simply return the test_outside_container here as the last statement in the function block
| let spec = SpecBuilder::default() | ||
| .linux( | ||
| LinuxBuilder::default() | ||
| .cgroups_path(Path::new("/runtime-test").join(cgroup_name)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is incorrect. For absolute cgroups path, it should be single level at root like /cgrouptest . Joining another path here would make it relative.
Hey, as @utam0k mentioned, no need to apologize, in fact I apologies if my comment seemed too harsh. We haven't mentioned this in the main issue as well, which we should, and I was suggesting that so it would be easier for us to review the PRs. 😅 😄 |
This implements the linux_cgroups_devices validation in #361