Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

Fix setting timing flag in client creation #91

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 11, 2019

Conversation

oporkka
Copy link
Member

@oporkka oporkka commented Sep 4, 2019

Fixed the timing flag logic so that timing given at the time of client
creation is used as fallback in case the timing is not given in
request parameters.

Added nock as a dependency to test the logic since it requires a real
request implementation to be called together with a client.

Fixed the timing flag logic so that `timing` given at the time of client
creation is used as fallback in case the `timing` is not given in
request parameters.

Added nock as a dependency to test the logic since it requires a real
`request` implementation to be called together with a client.
lib/client.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@shuhei
Copy link
Contributor

shuhei commented Dec 10, 2019

👍

@ruiaraujo
Copy link
Contributor

👍

1 similar comment
@grassator
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@grassator grassator closed this Dec 11, 2019
@grassator grassator reopened this Dec 11, 2019
@shuhei
Copy link
Contributor

shuhei commented Dec 11, 2019

👍

@grassator grassator merged commit 7b97879 into zalando-incubator:master Dec 11, 2019
@grassator
Copy link
Contributor

@shuhei Thanks a lot for the PRs. If you have an opportunity would be great to have travis CI setup with automatic NPM publish on version bump to make sure that features like this become immediately available to you and not blocked by manual publishing. If you have the time please provide your NPM username so I can add it to collaborators. Preferably send it through internal channels.

@shuhei
Copy link
Contributor

shuhei commented Dec 25, 2019

@grassator Sorry for this late reply. I created an issue for automatic publish. #99

I'll contact you in an internal channel after holidays.

@oporkka oporkka deleted the timing-opt-fix branch February 13, 2020 13:50
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants