This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 12, 2019. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add optional parameter to createAppTester to customize storeKey #147
Add optional parameter to createAppTester to customize storeKey #147
Changes from 1 commit
9a84580
ceb56fd
f9de801
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is good, but typically it's good to avoid
null
. It behaves weirdly with default args.That said, you don't actually have to set a default here. The verbose version of this function signature is
(appRaw, storeKey=undefined)
, but since js doesn't really enforce arguments at all, it's most clearly written as(appRaw, storeKey)
. Does that make sense?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see now that you likely copied the
null
from below. Honestly I shouldn't have written it like that in the first place. 😁There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
though it's perfect for quick adhoc use, i'd probably name this variable something else. maybe
customStoreKey
.That said, looking below, I'd probably move the ternary up here and rename that variable. So the whole thing would be
if you go that route, remember to adjust the
index.d.ts
appropriately.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good idea, I like your suggested variable name better.