Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(tests) Tests for cmd/root, cmd/clone, and cmd/fork #61

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 15, 2017
Merged

Conversation

zaquestion
Copy link
Owner

Largely part of an effort to improve coverage

Im more likely to miss a bug for "upstream" remotes since I use the other paradign, plus testing this way excercises more code
…ted after a lab fork

this doesnt exercise that the gitlab api call works to create a fork, that code makes up a small portion of labs code however. This test should exercise the bulk of labs effort to work with and create forks
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #61 into master will increase coverage by 5.8%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master      #61     +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   47.91%   53.72%   +5.8%     
=========================================
  Files          21       21             
  Lines         960      953      -7     
=========================================
+ Hits          460      512     +52     
+ Misses        382      308     -74     
- Partials      118      133     +15
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/gitlab/gitlab.go 31.21% <ø> (+4.33%) ⬆️
internal/git/git.go 68.8% <0%> (+5.5%) ⬆️
cmd/fork.go 26.47% <0%> (+20.58%) ⬆️
cmd/root.go 62.85% <0%> (+45.71%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c4062a8...27d23f4. Read the comment docs.

@zaquestion zaquestion merged commit 6540c63 into master Dec 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant