-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 290
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Binary encoding of JSON? #390
Comments
There isn't a previous discussion that I can remember.
…On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 16:23, Dennis Heimbigner ***@***.***> wrote:
Is there a previous discussion about storing the Json in a binary format
such as protobuf? Unidata experience with this for the OPeNDAP protocol
shows that parsing text is a performance bottleneck and that using e.g.
protobuf is much faster.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#390>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAq8QryXR4SE3NZlgdxgNYrS-KEhN6Zrks5vDgCZgaJpZM4aBUHt>
.
--
Alistair Miles
Head of Epidemiological Informatics
Centre for Genomics and Global Health
Big Data Institute
Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery
University of Oxford
Old Road Campus
Headington
Oxford
OX3 7LF
United Kingdom
Phone: +44 (0)1865 743596 or +44 (0)7866 541624
Email: alimanfoo@googlemail.com
Web: http://a <http://purl.org/net/aliman>limanfoo.github.io/
Twitter: @alimanfoo <https://twitter.com/alimanfoo>
Please feel free to resend your email and/or contact me by other means if
you need an urgent reply.
|
This blog post about what Uber did with JSON is kind of interesting and potentially relevant. We could consider adding a JSON filter chain much like the on we have for objects. The default could be to simply use |
Thanks for the pointer. I was actually proposing something different than |
Is there a previous discussion about storing the Json in a binary format
such as protobuf? Unidata experience with this for the OPeNDAP protocol
shows that parsing text is a performance bottleneck and that using e.g.
protobuf is much faster.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: