Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite sharding as a codec #223

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 18, 2023
Merged

Conversation

normanrz
Copy link
Contributor

This PR rewrites the sharding specification from ZEP2 as a codec.

@normanrz
Copy link
Contributor Author

normanrz commented Apr 4, 2023

jstriebel
jstriebel previously approved these changes Apr 15, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jstriebel jstriebel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, mostly LGTM 👍 Just found two links which are not working.

docs/v3/codecs/sharding-indexed/v1.0.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/v3/codecs/sharding-indexed/v1.0.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@normanrz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! Is there a tool to check the links?

@jstriebel
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Is there a tool to check the links?

I think it's in the output of sphinx, but you might need to remove the cache to see all warnings.

@normanrz normanrz requested review from jstriebel and jbms April 16, 2023 18:54
Copy link
Member

@jstriebel jstriebel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Should we merge this together with zarr-developers/zeps#34?

@normanrz
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM! Should we merge this together with zarr-developers/zeps#34?

Yes, please!

@jbms jbms merged commit 9740e2c into zarr-developers:main Apr 18, 2023
@jbms jbms mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants