microblaze: apply gcc patches from meta-xilinx repository #24
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Oct 1, 2023
alpsayin
force-pushed
the
zephyr-gcc-12.2.0-microblaze-recipes-27082023
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6ef44e7 to
ad6526e
Compare
alpsayin
changed the title
alpsayin
changed the title
This patchset fixes many known issues on gnu-toolchain for microblaze. But mainly the atomic-cas and binutils incorrect relocation issues. Patches obtained from https://github.com/xilinx/meta-xilinx/ repository, from meta-microblaze/recipes-devtools/gcc path. Below is a list of patches applied and squashed. Some patches that were already applied were reverted and re-applied to avoid conflicts. 0001-LOCAL-Testsuite-builtins-tests-require-fpic.patch 0002-LOCAL-Quick-fail-g-.dg-opt-memcpy1.C.patch 0003-LOCAL-For-dejagnu-static-testing-on-qemu-suppress-wa.patch 0004-Patch-testsuite-Add-MicroBlaze-to-target-supports-fo.patch 0005-Patch-testsuite-Update-MicroBlaze-strings-test.patch 0006-Patch-testsuite-Allow-MicroBlaze-.weakext-pattern-in.patch 0007-Patch-testsuite-Add-MicroBlaze-to-check_profiling_av.patch 0008-Patch-microblaze-Fix-atomic-side-effects.patch 0009-Patch-microblaze-Fix-atomic-boolean-return-value.patch 0010-Patch-microblaze-Fix-the-Microblaze-crash-with-msmal.patch 0011-Patch-microblaze-Added-ashrsi3_with_size_opt.patch 0012-Patch-microblaze-Use-bralid-for-profiler-calls.patch 0013-Patch-microblaze-Removed-moddi3-routinue.patch 0014-Patch-microblaze-Add-INIT_PRIORITY-support-Added.patch 0015-Patch-microblaze-Add-optimized-lshrsi3.patch 0016-Patch-microblaze-Add-cbranchsi4_reg.patch 0017-Patch-microblaze-Inline-Expansion-of-fsqrt-builtin.patch 0018-PATCH-microblaze.md-Improve-adddi3-and-subdi3-insn-d.patch 0019-Patch-microblaze-Update-ashlsi3-movsf-patterns.patch 0020-Patch-microblaze-8-stage-pipeline-for-microblaze.patch 0021-PATCH-21-53-Patch-microblaze-Correct-the-const-high-.patch 0022-Fix-microblaze-Fix-internal-compiler-error-with-msma.patch 0023-patch-microblaze-Fix-the-calculation-of-high-word-in.patch 0024-Patch-MicroBlaze-this-patch-has-1.Fixed-the-bug-in.patch 0025-Fixing-the-issue-with-the-builtin_alloc.patch 0026-Patch-Microblaze-Removed-fsqrt-generation-for-double.patch 0027-Patch-MicroBlaze-Intial-commit-of-64-bit-Microblaze.patch 0028-Intial-commit-for-64bit-MB-sources.patch 0029-Patch-MicroBlaze-re-arrangement-of-the-compare-branc.patch 0030-Patch-Microblaze-previous-commit-broke-the-handling-.patch 0031-Patch-Microblaze-Support-of-multilibs-with-m64.patch 0032-Patch-MicroBlaze-Fixed-issues-like.patch 0033-Patch-MicroBlaze.patch 0034-Added-double-arith-instructions.patch 0035-Fixed-the-issue-in-the-delay-slot-with-swap-instruct.patch 0036-Fixed-the-load-store-issue-with-the-32bit-arith-libr.patch 0037-extending-the-Dwarf-support-to-64bit-Microblaze.patch 0038-fixing-the-typo-errors-in-umodsi3-file.patch 0039-fixing-the-32bit-LTO-related-issue9-1014024.patch 0040-Fixed-the-missing-stack-adjustment-in-prologue-of-mo.patch 0041-Patch-Microblaze-corrected-SPN-for-dlong-instruction.patch 0042-fixing-the-long-long-long-mingw-toolchain-issue.patch 0043-Fix-the-MB-64-bug-of-handling-QI-objects.patch 0044-Patch-Microblaze-We-will-check-the-possibility-of-pe.patch 0045-Patch-MicroBlaze-fixed-typos-in-mul-div-and-mod-asse.patch 0046-Patch-microblaze-MB-64-removal-of-barrel-shift-instr.patch 0047-Added-new-MB-64-single-register-arithmetic-instructi.patch 0048-Patch-MicroBlaze-Added-support-for-64-bit-Immediate-.patch 0049-Patch-microblaze-Fix-Compiler-crash-with-freg-struct.patch 0050-Patch-microblaze-Add-TARGET_OPTION_OPTIMIZATION-and-.patch 0051-Patch-microblaze-Reducing-Stack-space-for-arguments.patch 0052-Patch-MicroBlaze.patch 0053-patch-microblaze64-Add-Zero_extended-instructions.patch Signed-off-by: Alp Sayin <alpsayin@gmail.com>
This is because I don't intend to offer Zephyr support for microblaze64 yet but also because the toolchain is buggy to the extent that it fails to build. Signed-off-by: Alp Sayin <alpsayin@gmail.com>
alpsayin
changed the title
alpsayin
force-pushed
the
zephyr-gcc-12.2.0-microblaze-recipes-27082023
branch
from
ad6526e to
73cc24d
Compare
stephanosio
approved these changes
Nov 13, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
microblaze: apply gcc patches from meta-xilinx repository
This patchset fixes many known issues on gnu-toolchain for microblaze.
But mainly the atomic-cas and binutils incorrect relocation issues.
Patches obtained from https://github.com/xilinx/meta-xilinx/ repository,
from meta-microblaze/recipes-devtools/gcc path.
Some patches that were already applied were reverted and re-applied to avoid conflicts.
Finally, I've given up and disabled microblaze64 toolchain build. meta-xilinx patches somehow manage to break the same toolchain that they introduced. I have no intention to support microblaze64 yet and this saves a few CI cycles.