Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

net: fix references to stack buffers #907

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2017

Conversation

andrewboie
Copy link
Contributor

The net_stack_analyze function wants to look at the stack buffer,
but it is making assumptions on where this data is that are no
longer valid. Change to use the proper APIs for referencing this.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie andrew.p.boie@intel.com

The net_stack_analyze function wants to look at the stack buffer,
but it is making assumptions on where this data is that are no
longer valid. Change to use the proper APIs for referencing this.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
@mike-scott
Copy link
Contributor

Tested successfully w/ new LwM2M client (which was previously page faulting): #712

@andrewboie
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: there are further patches I am working on that will detect this situation at build time, so we won't be surprised again.

@andrewboie andrewboie requested a review from pfalcon July 26, 2017 02:35
@jukkar jukkar merged commit e8cede7 into zephyrproject-rtos:master Jul 26, 2017
nagineni pushed a commit to nagineni/zephyr that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2017
…roject-rtos#907)

The check target calls trlite with a new -l flag that makes it run
on the current ZJS_BASE source tree w/o doing a git clone for a clean
tree.

The quickcheck calls trlite on just the Linux tests (VM zephyrproject-rtos#3).

Signed-off-by: Geoff Gustafson <geoff@linux.intel.com>
@andrewboie andrewboie deleted the net-stack-analyze branch May 31, 2018 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants